If left alone, it would have continued to work until my computer failed or the operating system became incompatible. It did not use the creator's electricity or run on the creator's computing resources in order to perform its function. But BetterTouchTool was not a service it was a monolithic application given in good faith for free for me to use. Nor have I claimed that a creator should be forced to support every old product they've ever made. I am not - have never - argued that a creator should be forced to keep allowing people to download their work for free. The creator somehow still owns that installation and is free to remove it as they wish. You seem to believe the creator is actively giving the software by the mere act that it is installed on my computer. In my opinion, the author gave me the software to use for free, with no qualifiers. I think we have a different perspective on the tense of this relationship. He can do this because he has done it once already. I refuse to pay the $3 because maybe next month he decides he needs some more money and installs another killswitch that demands $20. Popularity isn't worthless, and if you try to buy it, it's very far from free. He created fans of the software, and many people (including me) evangelized his software to many other potential users. And only purchasers get any more updates, seems cool with me.īut the developer DID get something from the years of releasing the app for free. Sure, all new download must be purchased.no problem with that. The best move would have been to leave the existing users alone. ANY free app could suddenly be any price at any moment, this is cool? You start up Chrome and suddenly Google is demanding $30 to keep using it? Reddit locks down their site and you need to pay $10/mo to access your account? I think it's weird no one sees a problem with it.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |